logo

The expert voice for energy efficiency in the UK.
Follow us:

Energy Efficiency,Technologies

Reducing CO2 Emissions through Energy Efficiency Technologies

The Opportunities for Reducing CO2 Emissions through Investment in Energy Efficiency Technologies

(funded by the Electricity Association.)
The Research Team at ACE were involved in a study assessing the opportunities for reducing carbon dioxide emissions through investment in energy efficiency technologies in all sectors of the UK economy. The study was carried out jointly with the Energy-Environment Policy Research Group of the Huxley School at Imperial College. Opportunities for improvement were identified by comparing a realistic high efficiency scenario with the anticipated business-as-usual development of energy use. Having identified the potential, the report discusses the policy programmes which could contribute to its realisation.

Continue Reading No Comments

Employment,Energy Efficiency

Employment Impacts of EESoP

The Employment Impacts of the Energy Efficiency Standards of Performance

(funded by the Energy Saving Trust and UNISON.)

ACE was involved in a study investigating the employment impacts of the Energy Efficiency Standards of Performance (EESoP) for Public Electricity Suppliers. The study estimated the direct employment involved in installing a range of measures implemented under SoP and the work needed to administer the programme itself. The short-term indirect employment impacts, resulting from reduced fuels bills, reduced demand for electricity and the increased spending of any newly employed people, were also investigated.

Summary of findings

The Standards of Performance for Energy Efficiency have involved direct annual employment of 210 people in management, marketing, development, monitoring and administration; and 184 people in the installation of insulation measures.

In addition to these 394 person years per year of direct employment, the local multiplier effects resulting from the programme led to the generation of a further 67 person years of work in the local economies affected by the schemes. This figure for additional employment in local economies is a conservative one, based on the latest government estimates of local multipliers.

Some Standards of Performance schemes generate more employment than others; for example, providing reduced cost and free CFLs requires far less labour effort than the provision of loft or cavity wall insulation. Thus, if the potential of the programme to assist in employment generation activities in the building industry is to be considered, these ‘employment generating’ schemes only should be included in the assessment of the costs.

Overall investment levels, per person year of direct employment created, were £25,700 in labour costs, plus £19,300 invested in energy efficiency materials.
For the construction industry jobs, labour costs were £27,500 per person year, of which £8,300 came from third parties, with associated materials costs of £41,300.
The project management and administration employment involved a range of skill levels and therefore labour costs. Averaged over all schemes, the labour costs in these tasks are estimated as £24,100 per person year. When indirect employment is also included in the calculations, the average labour-related programme cost falls to £22, 000 per person year. Including material costs, this figure becomes £39,000. These results compare well with current estimates of labour costs (for example, the Building Research Establishment suggest a figure of £30,000 per person year), which suggests that the estimates of the total work effort involved in the scheme are reasonable.

The CHPA also use an estimate of £30,000 required investment per person year of labour resulting from new CHP schemes. This assumption appears reasonable in comparison with the results of the present study; the development of CHP is likely to require, on average, a higher skill level in the newly employed than the implementation of an insulation programme, and therefore the related employment costs are likely to be somewhat higher. Thus, the demonstrated average cost per job created in the Standards of Performance programme seems to confirm the suggestion that this type of scheme is a good method of generating employment in sectors requiring a relatively low level of skills, and therefore suitable for many of the long-term unemployed.

If future schemes can be designed to incorporate employment opportunities for such people, the employment generated by the schemes is far more likely to have a permanent effect on employment levels; supply-side adjustments in the labour market which might act to offset initial employment gains are far less likely if the new jobs are taken by the long-term unemployed.

Continue Reading No Comments

Climate Change Targets

Climate change, CO2 emissions and moving targets – Discussion paper

There is now a consensus that climate change, caused largely by rising man-made emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), has begun to occur. The CO2 emissions result primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels to meet our energy needs. In 1990, the 300 scientists on the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) calculated that, to stabilise the CO2 composition of the atmosphere at its 1990 levels, global emissions would need to be drastically reduced. In the seven years since this prediction, estimates of CO2 emissions in the UK to the year 2000 and beyond have been constantly changing, and similarly targets for reductions are being constantly revised.

Continue Reading No Comments

Climate Change,Green Taxes

Green Taxes as a Tool to Combat Climate Change – Discussion Paper

In 1991, the European Commission put forward the idea of introducing a carbon/energy tax, with the objective of reducing fossil fuel consumption and hence CO2 emissions, while generally improving energy efficiency. There was much opposition to such a tax, due to worries about its regressive nature and its potentially damaging effect on international competitiveness. In addition, many Member States believe they should be free to control their own tax levels. As a result, new proposals have recently been introduced which, instead of imposing a new tax on carbon/energy, aim to harmonise excise duties on energy within European countries.

Continue Reading No Comments

CONTACT US | FIND US | US | © 2017 Association for the Conservation of Energy. CAN Mezzanine, Old Street, 49-51 East Road, London N1 6AH. Tel: 020 7250 8410. Registered company number 01650772